Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 22:08:47 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: 3c589d and FreeBSD 3.1 Message-ID: <199905241208.WAA04399@cheops.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Back when I was running 2.2.8 (and on a different laptop), I used zp0 with the 3c589D although it sucked with people recommending using ed0. Does that recommendation hold true for 3.1 ? FWIW, I've tried to boot a kernel with both ed0 & zp0 edit'd with "boot -c" but neither seem to be able to probe the card at the same `address' that Windows98 sees it at (IO 0x1020, IRQ 11). Any hints/tips on how to make it work ? Darren p.s. whoever broke "boot -c" options saving should be shot! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905241208.WAA04399>