Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 02:49:20 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Duty-cycle on mini's (was Re: Compiler patches ...) Message-ID: <2ECB33A5-AB0B-487C-BF33-641DB30BE31B@orthanc.ca> In-Reply-To: <42D0E32F.1000105@freebsd.org> References: <42CEF70A.2060605@freebsd.org> <20050709000616.22155977.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20050708230454.GA4742@dragon.NUXI.org> <42CF1B91.2090902@freebsd.org> <9F1F43A3-AD10-41CC-BD11-EF912D232D6B@orthanc.ca> <42D0E32F.1000105@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hmmm, Java ? That doesn't sound like FreeBSD :) > You're right -- it's the sound of rent :-( > FreeBSD/ppc's idle proc is the equivalent of running pinned 24x7. =20 > OSX may even have a temperature sensor/fan speed feedback loop ala =20 > the G5 to keep things under control. > I've spent a lot of time digging through the ADC documentation, but =20 I'll be damned if I can find anything about this. I have the Darwin =20 source checked out and will attempt a search through it, but I can't =20 say the code is organized in the most logical=86 manner. --lyndon =86 Why can't people just adopt the 44BSD layout? It's brilliantly =20 simple ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2ECB33A5-AB0B-487C-BF33-641DB30BE31B>