Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:20:01 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Don Lewis <dl-freebsd@catspoiler.org> Cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu, kabaev@bellatlantic.net, mb@imp.ch, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: GCC 3.2.1 update is coming Message-ID: <20021011052001.GA73095@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <200210110336.g9B3aJvU043765@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <20021010232253.GA68378@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200210110336.g9B3aJvU043765@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 08:36:19PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > On 10 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:10:44PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > >> > >> This is a terrible example in that its impossible to tell what > >> happened, but it sure shows that something is wrong. > >> > >> Is there a floating point regression suite that you can point me at? > >> That would be more useful for debugging. > >> > > > > ftp://ftp.netlib.org/fp/ucbtest.tgz > > > > This is Kahan and his students floating point testsuite. > > It normally check for conformance to IEEE-754. > > For something a bit older, see <http://www.netlib.org/paranoia/>. > > Paranoia only checks things like rounding and epsilon. ucbtest tests corner cases for the standard intrinsics. ucbtest should be a much better test of libm than paranoia. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021011052001.GA73095>