Date: 18 Oct 2001 13:12:46 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: Drew Tomlinson <drew@mykitchentable.net>, Mark.Andrews@isc.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dynamic IPFW Rules Message-ID: <xzpelo1fbgx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20011018031427.B3298@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <200110172350.f9HNor915316@drugs.dv.isc.org> <000d01c15777$1b9a8240$0301a8c0@bigdaddy> <20011018013856.C373@blossom.cjclark.org> <xzpitddffz9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20011018031427.B3298@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> writes: > Yeah. I said I would do that (what was I thinking?), but I was waiting > on Luigi to finish his updates in -CURRENT and MFCs. You can merge up to rev 1.109 if you also merge the kernel changes that correspond to rev 1.90. They've been in -CURRENT long enough. The only problem is that this will break binary compatibility because struct ipfw has changed, and good luck trying to skip rev 1.90 - you'll get nothing but conflicts. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpelo1fbgx.fsf>