Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 02:21:00 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: routed delete my PPP default: how to fight it? Message-ID: <199604072221.CAA01762@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <199604070955.LAA17302@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at "Apr 7, 96 11:55:43 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= wrote: > > > Apr 7 05:57:24 astral routed[51]: deleting route to interface tun0 (timed out) > > Apr 7 05:58:52 astral routed[51]: re-installing interface tun0 > > > > when carrier dropped. > > > How I can instruct routed NEVER delete route to tun0? > > killall routed :-) I try, but then my log overflowed by Apr 7 05:32:59 astral /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 194.58.229.133:520 from 194.58.229.133:520 messages from PPP (it is my address and routed service). User PPP needs someone listed at routed service. > Don't use it. Peter once wrote that rdisc should be ready for prime > time, and if you really need something more, use GateD. It allows you > to declare an interface as ``passive'', meaning GateD will never > delete the route out of this interface solely for the lack of getting > routing information from it. Gated is too large for home machine. Is rdisc work now? -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - http://dt.demos.su/~ache : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604072221.CAA01762>