Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:29:50 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wikipedia's perfection (was Re: Discussion of the relative advantages/disadvantages of PAE (was Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?)) Message-ID: <20070426172950.GA87931@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCKEACCAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <CEC61350-634D-49F0-95CD-D8A9E6B16919@cteresource.org> <20070426091732.afc20c20.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:17:32AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > Perhaps this was all just a devious plan by me to make you all look like > fools by watching your argue about the importance of checking sources > while none of you checked your sources ... > > Muhahaha ... > > In any event, it's been a fascinating sociological lesson for me. If you had provided the guy's Wikipedia account, we'd be able to check *your* sources -- wouldn't we? As long as you don't tell us the necessary information for checking up on it, we simply can't do anything with it. Sociological lesson? If you're just trying to get a reaction, I think the technical term is actually "trolling". -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] print substr("Just another Perl hacker", 0, -2);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070426172950.GA87931>