Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:46:34 -0400 From: "Grant Peel" <gpeel@thenetnow.com> To: "Jerry McAllister" <jerrymc@msu.edu>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> Subject: Re: Why 7.0 is so late ? Message-ID: <02ae01c811bf$96d757e0$6501a8c0@GRANT> References: <20071017133352.GE67677@pcjas.obspm.fr><47161B5D.9050002@pacific.net.sg><20071017165423.G89276@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl><13413b8f0710170920t5e5a03f9tcd703e6239db0296@mail.gmail.com><20071017192628.GA1238@kobe.laptop><20071018180902.GB28392@demeter.hydra> <20071018190507.GB57252@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
DItto DItto Ditto! -also- I wait another two years if it means I can 'upgrade' from 6.2 to 7.0 = (CVS?) without having to restage the whole system!!! -Grant ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Jerry McAllister=20 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 Cc: Jerry McAllister=20 Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Why 7.0 is so late ? On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:09:02PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:26:28PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >=20 > > Traditionally, "BSD" has released stuff "when it was ready" and = not when > > some marketting team decided that they wanted to release. The = FreeBSD > > team has made genuine efforts towards changing this to a more = timely > > release schedule (18 months for a new "major" release), but there = have > > been some important bits of kernel and userland which were a bit > > unstable and/or were in development until now. >=20 > I'd much rather that a RELEASE version is as stable as it can = reasonably > be made than that it arrives "on time". Seriously. As far as I'm > concerned, take as long as you must to make it as stable as you can. > Sooner is better, all else being equal, but if stability is = sacrificed in > any way then all else isn't equal. >=20 > New versions should fix things and provide updated functionality, = not > just meet a schedule. It's not like some kind of sales quota needs = to be > met. Yup. I think that is the way all of us feel. Just a little more of a clue for the rest of us on how things are coming would be helpful. ////jerry > --=20 > CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] > Kent Beck: "I always knew that one day Smalltalk would replace Java. = I > just didn't know it would be called Ruby." > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Total Control Panel Login =20 To: gpeel@thenetnow.com Block messages from this sender = (blacklist) =20 From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Remove this sender = from my whitelist =20 =20 You received this message because the sender is on your = whitelist. =20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02ae01c811bf$96d757e0$6501a8c0>