Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 09:23:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> To: Sergey <serge69@nym.alias.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905250922001.21875-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> In-Reply-To: <19990525053706.15157.qmail@nym.alias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why not upgrade to -STABLE and solve the problem? I also had panics under 3.1-RELEASE, but they were all fixed within one week of -STABLE upgrades. SB On Tue, 25 May 1999, Sergey wrote: > Hi! > > I've checked this out on good hardware. And now can CLAIM that > 3.1-R *really* have kernel problems on FreeBSD's "classic" configuration. > This bug causes TERRIBLE instability - panic in 24 hours. Even Microsoft's > OSes gives significantly better results > > > > This is mourning day for me - I CAN'T believe in stability of RELEASES > any more... > > > With best regards, Sergey. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9905250922001.21875-100000>