Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Sep 2006 14:52:34 +0100
From:      "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To:        "Mark Kirkwood" <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc:        amd64@freebsd.org, Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards
Message-ID:  <079e01c6d417$3890fc40$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20060907184316.GC56998@svcolo.com> <035701c6d2c3$eb574aa0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <FEDA1103-8D83-4D43-9731-7E3D9D2DB1E5@svcolo.com> <001001c6d327$25dc07c0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <4502123D.705@paradise.net.nz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Just out of interest what RAID level was the 5 disk array? - as
> 180Mb/s from an Areca 5 disk RAID0 or RAID5 array is not that good -
> my old 3Ware 7506 with 4 Maxtor IDE RAID0 gets 175Mb/s. Obviously if
> your array is RAID10, the 180MB/s is very good!
> 
> If you are using RAID0|5, then something is slowing you down (possible
> clash between disk firmware and the Areca, or unfortunate choice of
> strip chunk size).

Dont know which test I was remembering but just did a quicky:
OS: FreeBSD 6.1
RAID: 5 on 5 * 400GB Seagate
Controller: HighPoint 1820a
CPU: Dual Opteron 244
RAM: 2Gb
/usr/bin/time -h dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=1048576 count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes transferred in 44.887239 secs (233602250 bytes/sec)
        44.88s real             0.03s user              2.40s sys

In comparison:
OS: FreeBSD 5.4
RAID: 5 on 6 * 300GB Seagate
Controller: Areca 1120
CPU: Dual Opteron 248
RAM: 4Gb
/usr/bin/time -h dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=1048576 count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10485760000 bytes transferred in 81.598938 secs (128503633 bytes/sec)
        1m21.60s real           0.00s user              2.69s sys

So for the money they HighPoint is nothing to be sneezed at.

Of course this is a very crude test not comparing totally like for
like. Under load the Areca is quicker and has the flexibility of
online capacity expansion and raid level migration but...

    Steve


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?079e01c6d417$3890fc40$b3db87d4>