Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 06:21:50 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/security/audit audit_arg.c Message-ID: <20060204192150.GE1030@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <86u0bf9q3c.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200602032350.k13NoQ1c047653@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060203155613.J41267@knight.iXsystems.com> <200602040111.12261.max@love2party.net> <86u0bf9q3c.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2006-Feb-04 15:05:27 +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>Max Laier <max@love2party.net> writes:
>> As for %ju, I think it's stupid. I even believe that %llu shouldn't
...
>> We are seeing this type of porting problem over and over again,
>> there should be a better sollution.
>
>There is in C99: printf("%" PRIu64 "\n", foo);
Max was asking for a _better_ solution. I respectfully suggest that
the above is an abomination forced upon us because of shortcomings in
the C language/library.
--
Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060204192150.GE1030>