Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:20:47 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 244878] Kernel panic due to spin lock held too long
Message-ID:  <bug-244878-227-U5SpqPt4QT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-244878-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-244878-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244878

--- Comment #2 from Adam Jimerson <vendion@gmail.com> ---
The best I can find is the following from /var/log/messages

Limiting closed port RST response from 246 to 200 packets/sec
spin lock 0xffffffff8200cc50 (smp rendezvous) held by 0xfffff8024555e000 (tid
101747) too long
timeout stopping cpus
panic: spin lock held too long
cpuid = 0
time = 1584487103
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0xffffffff80c1d2b7 at kdb_backtrace+0x67
#1 0xffffffff80bd05ed at vpanic+0x19d
#2 0xffffffff80bd0443 at panic+0x43
#3 0xffffffff80bb09ad at _mtx_lock_indefinite_check+0x6d
#4 0xffffffff80bb04f5 at _mtx_lock_spin_cookie+0xd5
#5 0xffffffff80c2d539 at smp_rendezvous_cpus+0x239
#6 0xffffffff80bcb071 at _rm_wlock+0x171
#7 0xffffffff80cf8d48 at rt_foreach_fib_walk+0xa8
#8 0xffffffff80e21a37 at in6_mtutimo+0x47
#9 0xffffffff80bea743 at softclock_call_cc+0x143
#10 0xffffffff80beac09 at softclock+0x79
#11 0xffffffff80b93dd4 at ithread_loop+0x1d4
#12 0xffffffff80b90c43 at fork_exit+0x83
#13 0xffffffff81082a6e at fork_trampoline+0xe
Uptime: 7h42m4s

Everything before that looks normal to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-244878-227-U5SpqPt4QT>