Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:27:03 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org>, Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)
Message-ID:  <20011120162703.A34879@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011120151250.C36033@heechee.tobez.org>
References:  <20011114021956.B10325@iclub.nsu.ru> <3BF19EA9.3FC5F040@mindspring.com> <20011119181949.R32927@sunbay.com> <20011119222854.B38492@iclub.nsu.ru> <20011120150239.D7645@sunbay.com> <20011120151250.C36033@heechee.tobez.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:12:50PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:02:39PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:28:55PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> 
> > > I asked tobez (he is an originator and he took responsibility on
> > > this PR) and he said that src/ must be audited also -- he said that
> > > some initgroups() callers do not print error message because
> > > initgroups() did this previously.
> > > 
> > > I'll try to do this before this weekend and I will post combined
> > > patch to audit@
> 
> > While this is indeed a good thing to do, this is completely unrelated to
> > the above mentioned problem, and should be done separately.  Here's the
> > list of src/ files that do not check the return value of initgroups(3),
> > and may need to be fixed, but some of them explicitly ignore the result
> > to indicate the fact they consider this error non-fatal.
> 
> > libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c
> > libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c
> > usr.bin/calendar/calendar.c
> > usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c
> 
> There used to be *many* more problematic files.  Please see
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=801566+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010722.freebsd-stable
> 
> To my knowledge, only printjob.c was fixed, though I have not looked
> into every file in the list since then.
> 
Yes, but I specifically left contrib/ and crypto/ files, and files that
do not check the result of other calls like setgrp() etc.

> But as I said in the private message, I do not feel strongly about this,
> and I think that the fix can be safely committed.  I do not think these
> things are quite unrelated, though.  :-)
> 
Not checking the return value is always BAD except when (not) done
intentionally (flagged by a(void)ing the return value of a function),
whether or not a function in question prints some diagnostic output
on standard error; that's why I still think these problems are in
fact unrelated.  :-)


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Oracle Developer/DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011120162703.A34879>