Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li>
To:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags
Message-ID:  <200309162120.h8GLKB7M029094@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/56902; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li>
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:14:53 +0200

 "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
 > On 2003.09.15 22:35:55 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote:
 > 
 > > --- article.sgml.orig	Mon Sep 15 18:39:23 2003
 > > +++ article.sgml	Mon Sep 15 18:50:50 2003
 > > @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@
 > >  
 > >      <para>Other areas are prepared for configuration, but will not work
 > >        until stage two is completed.  For example we have copied files to
 > > -      configure printing and X11.  Printing however is likely to need
 > > +      configure printing and <application>X11</application>.  Printing however is likely to need
 > 
 > I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not
 > really an application, but rather the protocol/framework.  Have you
 > found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag?
 
 for me it was in this association talking about X11 as an association,
 but i looked at the handbook chapter about X and only XFree86 was marked
 up as application so you are right here.
 
 shall i redo this patch and pr 56903 to leave X11 with markup?
 
 -josef
 
 -- 
 www: http://www.daemon.li
 nic-hdl: JER1080312-NICAT
 BSD in AT: www.bsdcode.at
 "Make World - Not War!"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309162120.h8GLKB7M029094>