Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:57:59 -0700 From: Edgar Martinez <emartinez@kbcnetworks.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: PANIC - SWBMISS (9.0-CURRENT) Message-ID: <957EB052144AA64AB39F7AB268783201022F835FD3@VA3DIAXVS881.RED001.local> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok29WLMh3SGXvB31mwsnTitYkZhTsTccizDn2u96mNoXQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
when I used your patch, it just panic'd on boot. So I took the "spirit" of your patches, and reapplied. Also the TDMA patch produced errors, and I left it out from mine, so I haven't tested that yet either. -----Original Message----- From: adrian.chadd@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adrian Chadd Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:55 PM To: Edgar Martinez Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PANIC - SWBMISS (9.0-CURRENT) Hm, I'm confused. The whole point of using callout_init_mtx() is so that ieee80211_swbmiss() will be called with the ic lock held. It's supposed to remove any chance of races with adding/removing/running the callout. I'll recompile my test STAs with lock debugging and this patch; see if I can trigger it. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?957EB052144AA64AB39F7AB268783201022F835FD3>