Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 20:47:57 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Brian Handy <handy@sag.space.lockheed.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing. Message-ID: <199802230347.UAA26504@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.96.980222163708.19637A-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980222174223.14406Y-100000@localhost> <Pine.OSF.3.96.980222163708.19637A-100000@sag.space.lockheed.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I think Jordan and Greg both have points they are correct about. What > >about making a web page that the offender gets put on ... nothing > >incredibly horrible, just a rogues gallery (I broke current on 00/00/00 > >with a commit to " ... ". [Followed up with John Dyson as an example] > > People are confusing some issues here, and Terry pointed this out to me. > Chuck is wrong, because John in fact does *not* often break the tree. His > stuff makes it unstable and crash, but that's not the problem here. Exactly! I'm not complaining about 'buggy/complex' software, but about stupid silly bugs. Things not building, include files not working in a 'build world', stuff that compiles but could never even run, etc... Basicaly, simply Q&A stuff is what I'm complaining about, not highly complex fixes to bugs that don't show up in simply Q&A testing. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802230347.UAA26504>