Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 01:08:30 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@tislabs.com>, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update to UFS2 Superblock Format Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211250107060.34466-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200211250619.gAP6J059068226@beastie.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: > Some of these fields could usefully be made unsigned others not > (for example fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes). So just > going through and making everything unsigned is not the right > approach. I will make a pass through and consider changing some > of these fields once the tree opens back up, but not at this > point in time when we are trying to keep changes to a minimum > and do not have time for extensive testing. > > Kirk McKusick I'm not in a hurry.. It's just something that I thought should be considered..... "eventually". BTW how can fs_pendingblocks and fs_pendinginodes be -ve? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211250107060.34466-100000>