Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:00:07 +0100 From: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> To: FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha Message-ID: <20050315100007.GF696@loge.nixsys.be> In-Reply-To: <20050315092801.840557306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> References: <20050315092801.840557306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-03-15 04:28:01 (-0500), FreeBSD Tinderbox <tinderbox@freebsd.org> wrote:
> /tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_pf/pf_snmp.c: In function `pf_dump':
> /tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_pf/pf_snmp.c:1147: warning: size_t format, different type arg (arg 3)
> /tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_pf/pf_snmp.c:1152: warning: size_t format, different type arg (arg 3)
> /tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_pf/pf_snmp.c:1157: warning: size_t format, different type arg (arg 3)
> *** Error code 1
Ugh, looks like I broke this...
Is there a special magical format to use to printf a time_t without having it
break on at least one of the architectures we support?
Also, <don asbestos undies>, is there a specific reason for not having a 64bit
wide time_t on Alpha?
- Philip
--
Philip Paeps Please don't Cc me, I am
philip@freebsd.org subscribed to the list.
BOFH Excuse #213:
Change your language to Finnish.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050315100007.GF696>