Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Aug 2025 13:16:36 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 287926] sysutils/vagrant: conflicts with www/gitlab
Message-ID:  <bug-287926-21402-mBOVmkfbS5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-287926-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-287926-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287926

John Hein <jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
                   |                            |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2830
                   |                            |73
                 CC|                            |ruby@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #12 from John Hein <jcfyecrayz@liamekaens.com> ---
Matthias, it seems that adding dependencies on -gitlab flavors are going to
keep causing problems.

Please re-read bug bug 283073, comment 0 and bug 283073, comment 3.

Now that you have added a number of rubygem*-gitlab ports as run-time
dependencies for sysutils/vagrant, many other ports are now in conflict at
run-time, including but not necessarily limited to the following:

sysutils/rubygem-fluentd    rubygem-logger & rubygem-logger-gitlab conflict
www/rubygem-rest-client    rubygem-logger & rubygem-logger-gitlab conflict
security/metasploit        multiple conflicts

As suggested in bug 283703, there has to be a better way to build gitlab if it
depends on special versions of some rubygem* ports.

Most of these rubygem*-gitlab ports are no different than their non -gitlab
flavors other than in name.

If gitlab needs its own unique rubygem* port, consider putting those gems in a
namespace that is private to gitlab.

This proliferation of rubygem*-gitlab ports that are not actually needed by
non-gitlab ports is not tenable.

Maybe this is a wider ruby question - how to support ports that require
conflicting versions of particular gems.  Apologies if this has already been
discussed somewhere.  ruby@ CC'd.  Comments welcome.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-287926-21402-mBOVmkfbS5>