Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:18:11 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 Message-ID: <200501072218.20970.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net> References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de> <20050107092110.GG49329@submonkey.net> <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:40, Xin LI wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS. My > > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on > > FreeBSD. > > I guess that this might worth investigating: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html It's nice to see constructive info amidst the flamage :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB3ncE5ZPcIHs/zowRAuTTAKCHVT4UPYnQP1QK71TxV5Tgax5cIQCglg4B W+YsMjQzkQwTmpUdwGrO2ww= =gJcS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501072218.20970.doconnor>