Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:14:08 -0400 From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: jmb@hub.freebsd.org, ragnar@sysabend.org, brett@lariat.org, dscheidt@enteract.com, noslenj@swbell.net, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dual 400 -> dual 600 worth it? Message-ID: <38582ED0.7F5D15E1@vangelderen.org> References: <199912160005.RAA25668@usr09.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > > Now if only IKE/ISAKMP weren't based on clipper chip technology..
> >
> > It's said to see someone like you issue such a FUDish statement. IKE
> > may have it's problems but this has nothing to do with it's 'Clipper
> > heritage'.
>
> ";login:" is read by a hell of a lot more people than my
> posts to "chat".
What's your point?
> The ";login:" article identifies many attacks against IKE/ISAKMP,
> and provides source code for one of them.
This still has nothing to do with it's 'Clipper heritage' as you
originally implied[1].
> > This reinforces my comments above. And if you quote the *relevant*
> > sections of the document it will become even clearer...
>
> The ";login:" document, or the IKE/ISAKMP document?
The ";login:" document. The part you quoted doesn't tell us that
the problems stem from any 'Clipper heritage', so quote the
relevant part.
> > > It's interesting that OpenBSD has implemented IKE/ISAKMP already.
> >
> > What are you trying to say?
>
> That perhaps they would have something useful to say on the
> subject.
Can't get less FUD^H^H^Huseful, so I agree.
Cheers,
Jeroen
[1] "Now if only IKE/ISAKMP weren't based on clipper chip
technology..." -- Terry Lambert
--
Jeroen C. van Gelderen - jeroen@vangelderen.org
Interesting read: http://www.vcnet.com/bms/ JLF
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38582ED0.7F5D15E1>