Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:57:50 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: julian@elischer.org, myevmenkin@att.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NETGRAPH patches (proposal) Message-ID: <20000223085750.A29008@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <200002230502.VAA84742@bubba.whistle.com>; from archie@whistle.com on Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 09:02:43PM -0800 References: <38B34BBA.41C67EA6@elischer.org> <200002230502.VAA84742@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 09:02:43PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: > > It's because all packets sent by this node should have the node's > > address. If you don't have it then PPPoE cannot send a packet "FROM" > > thia node, as it has no idea of what this node's address is. > > So.. we can have two hooks, one that sets the host address and > one that doesn't.. :-) In that case can we have one that also sets the destination address via arp? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000223085750.A29008>