Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:40:02 -0700 (PDT) From: <fenner@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/22385 Message-ID: <200010290540.WAA56262@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/22385; it has been noted by GNATS. From: <fenner@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/22385 Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Turns out you need to use ltconfig (GNU libtool) 1.3.4-freebsd-ports (1.385.2.196 1999/12/07 21:47:57) as installed by the libtool-1.3.4_1 port, since it has different behavior than ltconfig (GNU libtool) 1.3.4-freebsd-ports (1.385.2.196 1999/12/07 21:47:57) as installed by the libtool-1.3.4 port. It's probably a problem that there's no way to tell from the version messages that these programs behave differently, and it's probably also a problem that imagemagick depends on the newer one but there's no way for it to inform the system of that. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010290540.WAA56262>