Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:42:05 -0600 From: "Wm. Daryl Hawkins" <dhawkins@tamu.edu> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Intel i8xx watchdog driver Message-ID: <3D0AE03BE5EFEC4DB04D42326CA218477D5102@spruce.ne.tamu.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes. The version for current hasn't seen as much testing as the version = for stable. I only have one or two test boxes with current on them, but = it seems to be working just fine with watchdogd. -- Daryl -----Original Message----- From: Poul-Henning Kamp [mailto:phk@phk.freebsd.dk] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:35 AM To: Wm. Daryl Hawkins Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel i8xx watchdog driver=20 In message <3D0AE03BE5EFEC4DB04D42326CA218477D5101@spruce.ne.tamu.edu>, = "Wm. Da ryl Hawkins" writes: > >I've written a driver for the Intel i8xx TCO watchdog timer for >both FreeBSD-CURRENT and FreeBSD-STABLE.=20 Is this written against the <sys/watchdog.h> API in -current ? --=20 Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe =20 Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by = incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D0AE03BE5EFEC4DB04D42326CA218477D5102>