Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:13:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 257525] lang/ruby26: add DTRACE option Message-ID: <bug-257525-21402-Xs9BfsmAg2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-257525-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-257525-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257525 --- Comment #8 from Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Evgeniy Khramtsov from comment #7) Could you try running the scripts in this repo with your setup: https://github.com/swills/dtrace_thing and posting the results? You can leave out the particular md5 checksums if = you want, but it would be helpful to know if they produce the same results on multiple runs or not. I wonder if this is a problem with the ports tool chain, this might help sh= ow that. I'm fine with adding the DTRACE option if we can better understand the issue and perhaps file a bug for the root cause, but simply turning it off as a workaround without understanding the issue seems like a bad idea, to me. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257525-21402-Xs9BfsmAg2>