Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:48:25 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: re(4) lockups on a MSI K9AG Neo2-Digital (7.0-BETA3 amd64) Message-ID: <20071127014825.GA6110@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <474B3E85.4080502@gmail.com> References: <474A7F83.7080900@FreeBSD.org> <20071126092457.GE1025@cdnetworks.co.kr> <474B3E85.4080502@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:45:41PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: [...] > > > > Me either. I have a WIP version that fixes other issues on re(4) but > > I'm not sure whether it mitigates your issue. The overhauled re(4) > > supports larger descriptors(256 instead of 64) and TSO. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_re.c > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/if_rlreg.h > > Before I try them what is the difference between these and two other > posted patches? and second since I use a cvs repo against -current can Sorry, I don't know what patches you are referring to. Maybe I've posted too many patches. :( > you repost them as patches? (if no on the second I will make an > attempt to do it but I am still new at making patches) > Sure. http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.patch -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071127014825.GA6110>