Date: 12 Feb 2003 11:53:48 +0100 From: Frank Tegtmeyer <fte-sub-freebsd-questions@fte.to> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Resolving or blocking eg. doubleclick.net? Message-ID: <m3d6lxvkg3.fsf@teg.local> In-Reply-To: <200302121109.33305.kde.nospam@mekanix.dk> References: <200302121029.14713.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> <200302121109.33305.kde.nospam@mekanix.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <kde.nospam@mekanix.dk> writes: > Tried it, but really got confused trying to install it. Ended up having a > service dir created all over my system. Never got it to work. Dan Bernstein is always interested to hear about difficulties with his instructions. You have to follow the instructions to the letter. I never saw something go wrong, so it's likely you missed a phrase or sentence. I recommend trying again. BIND is a pain compared to dnscache. Regarding your problem: resolving ad.doubleclick.net takes about 0.5s at my ADSL connection - with an empty cache. I think your problem is possibly at the network layer. What results give the following commands? dig @205.138.3.20 ad.doubleclick.net dig @208.211.225.10 ad.doubleclick.net dig @204.176.177.10 ad.doubleclick.net dig @204.253.104.10 ad.doubleclick.net You should get a CNAME answer and an "additional section". You may try then one of the nameservers of the additional section and the given CNAME. Regards, Frank To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3d6lxvkg3.fsf>