Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:19:59 -0500
From:      Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Cy Schubert <cy@freebsd.org>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,  svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r364817 - head/libexec/rc/rc.d
Message-ID:  <CACNAnaHw-QM_nFZ%2BjhLwjdUEg9WceybhhcBep6oiiNv-EBH6cQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e96ff14-1d81-c42f-21f6-1ae55aa9ce76@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202008261313.07QDDwRm040119@repo.freebsd.org> <7e55d429-482b-2277-b340-2b85c687440e@FreeBSD.org> <202008271350.07RDoGqn055838@slippy.cwsent.com> <202008271354.07RDsTeW084744@slippy.cwsent.com> <202008271403.07RE3U56090900@slippy.cwsent.com> <CACNAnaGNJBcBp4tpUL5EK772BwAC02R_dQCMcohqHnzQ50aboA@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaFbFd%2BsRigaO5W88LFYXDKgsJC%2BU5rYXZFMqUgMiad4TQ@mail.gmail.com> <5e96ff14-1d81-c42f-21f6-1ae55aa9ce76@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:59 AM Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-27 17:06, Kyle Evans wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer
> >>> than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache?
> >>>
> >>> slippy$ lh /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
> >>> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   4.6K Aug 25 07:19 /boot/zfs/zpool.cache
> >>> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   4.7K Aug 27 06:20 /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
> >>> slippy$
> >>>
> >>> Something like, for I in $(ls -t /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
> >>> /boot/zfs/zpool.cache) with the break?
> >>>
> >>
> >> /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is the new location and should generally be
> >> favored if it exists, I reckon.
> >
> > I retract the above. :-) ls -t makes sense.
> >
>
> I actually was about to agree with your first suggestion.
>

I think it's the correct long-term solution, but it kind of depends on
what we're thinking now- if we expect one might test-boot a disk on an
older FreeBSD/ZFS that's still using /boot, there's a chance it will
contain the more recent data.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaHw-QM_nFZ%2BjhLwjdUEg9WceybhhcBep6oiiNv-EBH6cQ>