Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:52:27 +0100
From:      Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.hackers@mailing.thruhere.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Linda Messerschmidt <linda.messerschmidt@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Superpages on amd64 FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE
Message-ID:  <20091210155226.GA59257@serenity>
In-Reply-To: <200912071620.03371.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.hackers@mailing.thruhere.net>
References:  <237c27100911260714x2fcb194ew1e6ce11e764efd08@mail.gmail.com> <867htduvwh.fsf@ds4.des.no> <237c27100911260911w2674b79ds8ac447e900324dce@mail.gmail.com> <200912071620.03371.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.hackers@mailing.thruhere.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:20:03PM +0100, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009 18:11:10 Linda Messerschmidt wrote:
>=20
> > I did not mean to suggest that we were asking for help solving a
> > problem with squid rotation.  I provided that information as
> > background to discuss what we observed as a potential misbehavior in
> > the new VM superpages feature, in the hope that if there is a problem
> > with the new feature, we can help find/resolve it or, if this is
> > working as intended, hopefully gain some insight as to what's going
> > on.
>=20
> I tend to agree with this, though I don't know the nitty gritty of the=20
> implementation, it seems that:
> a) superpages aren't copied efficiently (at all?) on fork and probably ot=
her=20
> workloads
> b) vfork is encouraged for memory intensive applications, yet:
> BUGS
>      This system call will be eliminated when proper system sharing mecha=
nisms
>      are implemented.  Users should not depend on the memory sharing sema=
ntics
>      of vfork() as it will, in that case, be made synonymous to fork(2).
>=20

FYI, this comment has been removed a couple of weeks ago in HEAD and
the STABLE branches.

- Christian

--=20
Christian Brueffer	chris@unixpages.org	brueffer@FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkshGToACgkQbHYXjKDtmC1oEgCdF6W6Xt2lfK+HBdiIv+Vc/5XG
jgYAn2OULbuj8pPu9AMNlJRGBCdbx4Gr
=YPjW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091210155226.GA59257>