Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:26:11 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <current@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'make includes' ownership patch Message-ID: <20010528102611.B16715@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200105281722.KAA56879@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>; from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700 References: <20010528113318.D32649@sunbay.com> <200105281722.KAA56879@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:22:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > This was on my TODO. The only problem with INCOWN/INCGRP not being > > used here is that they were introduced long after include/Makefile. > > And perhaps one should go read the commit message that introduced them... > it was an experiment, a sample test designed to only be used in -current > /usr/src/lib, that BDE, Sheldon and myself had long followon conversations > about, and got dropped into the cracks. What was the reasoning for a serperate owner specification from BIN*? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010528102611.B16715>