Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:13:48 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: Status of iwi vs. iwiNG? Message-ID: <200702201713.55025.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20070220062336.B73545@xorpc.icir.org> References: <17881.55349.540268.887090@canoe.dclg.ca> <20070220062336.B73545@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5427776.UGy9PlW1O4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 20 February 2007 15:23, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:02:45PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > > I'd like to know the status of the iwi driver vs. iwiNG. I've been > > using iwiNG for some time now and I don't see any notes in the CVS > > log of iwi that the changes have been merged. > > what/where is iwiNG ? The code David probably referers to was committed in "if_iwi.c rev. 1.35,=20 Thu Apr 27 21:43:37 2006 UTC (9 months, 3 weeks ago)" and has been=20 availabe from http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/ before. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart5427776.UGy9PlW1O4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF2x5DXyyEoT62BG0RAqraAJ9T1B7PB43PU/Q5wfKJhwxmpkxapwCfV7o/ GHmgFD2rNgtgvn53iugyHp0= =v0EW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5427776.UGy9PlW1O4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702201713.55025.max>