Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 09:08:20 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Response to Fatal Flaw in BSD (part 2) Message-ID: <20000620090820.A15934@physics.iisc.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <200006192016.QAA23911@rac4.wam.umd.edu>; from howardjp@wam.umd.edu on Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 04:16:10PM -0400 References: <200006192016.QAA23911@rac4.wam.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> availability and interoperability is also based on it's liberal licensing > and the fact any vendor who wished to include the tool could with > not hassel. "without hassle"? Other things (eg "it's" above) seem to have been pointed out already. R. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000620090820.A15934>