Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 21:13:47 -1000 (HST) From: "David Langford" <langfod@dihelix.com> To: taob@risc.org (Brian Tao) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, randy@zyzzyva.com Subject: Re: "interfaces" patch to BIND (was Re: problem with over 133 virutal domains with apache on 2.1.7) Message-ID: <199703300713.VAA01023@caliban.dihelix.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970329203943.3657A-100000@alpha.risc.org> from Brian Tao at "Mar 30, 97 01:37:33 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Any reasons that we cant add something like this to the default named? I assume that if you dont have an "interface" line that it acts nomrally. Thanks, -David Langford langfod@dihelix.com > A few people asked me about the "interfaces" patch for BIND 4.9.5. >It allows you to specify which particular IP's you want named to >listen on, instead of all available interfaces. This is useful if you >are running BIND on a server handling a lot of virtual Web sites. > > The location of the patch is at: > >http://www.ultra.net/~jzp/andrews.patch.txt > >-- >Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) >"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703300713.VAA01023>