Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:23:13 +0000 (GMT) From: jenkins-admin@freebsd.org To: delphij@FreeBSD.org, mjg@FreeBSD.org, br@FreeBSD.org, brooks@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, kp@FreeBSD.org, ume@FreeBSD.org, jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9 - Build #73 - Fixed Message-ID: <491070378.115.1433971394542.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <369064660.102.1433931362806.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> References: <369064660.102.1433931362806.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9 - Build #73 - Fixed: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/73/ to view the results. From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 10 22:08:36 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF193C5D; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jenkins-admin@freebsd.org) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (jenkins-9.freebsd.org [8.8.178.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE171108C; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jenkins-admin@freebsd.org) Received: from jenkins-9.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jenkins-9.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85BB217; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:08:35 +0000 (GMT) From: jenkins-admin@freebsd.org To: jenkins-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1067822702.118.1433974115476.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1325037805.92.1433896800563.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> References: <1325037805.92.1433896800563.JavaMail.jenkins@jenkins-9.freebsd.org> Subject: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1098 - Fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Jenkins-Job: FreeBSD_HEAD-tests X-Jenkins-Result: SUCCESS Precedence: bulk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:08:36 -0000 FreeBSD_HEAD-tests - Build #1098 - Fixed: Check console output at https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1098/ to view the results. From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 11 03:44:46 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1823ED for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 03:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from mail.strugglingcoder.info (strugglingcoder.info [65.19.130.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B67A1643 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 03:44:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.1.3]) (Authenticated sender: hiren@strugglingcoder.info) by mail.strugglingcoder.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 634F3CFA9D; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:44:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:44:45 -0700 From: hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: setting tunables in stable/10 vs head? Message-ID: <20150611034445.GB4757@strugglingcoder.info> References: <1249942556.55526194.1433967239788.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1249942556.55526194.1433967239788.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 03:44:46 -0000 --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/10/15 at 04:13P, Rick Macklem wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some > tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although the MFC didn't break > anything, the tunables don't get changed by the values in /boot/loader.co= nf. >=20 > By applying a patch like this: > SYSCTL_DECL(_vfs_nfsd); > int nfsrv_statehashsize =3D NFSSTATEHASHSIZE; > +TUNABLE_INT("vfs.nfsd.statehashsize", &nfsrv_statehashsize); > SYSCTL_INT(_vfs_nfsd, OID_AUTO, statehashsize, CTLFLAG_RDTUN, > &nfsrv_statehashsize, 0, > "Size of state hash table set via loader.conf"); >=20 > they get set ok. >=20 > So, is this correct or have I done something stupid? I believe that is correct. hans changed how they are declared with r267961 and now you do not need TUNABLE_INT() on -head. >=20 > And, if it correct, do I commit a patch like the above directly > to stable/10. (It seems that TUNABLE_INT() is discouraged for -head.) That's the correct way, afaik. Cheers, Hiren --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVeQQsXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/lejcH/2xkrL2M73H7LTk0vctAK73o dB3BqqFFFrfp5vXCuVv7OovOfVnFUP5vkS8HJzkbsbD2Djuq3q7SxnTIvSYKJBlO YqBIbhcYn3C9OF3qW+K/adTBAAgphxwwMA0qY7eCgJNw9pQDWNQBwsHy+cw2Pcq2 oplZBcJXQR4yTBGkE6F3AQxh+/ykKCYvql/oS/O55sXoCFMBuY1j5qhZIBlXudij xXjzYwnHj5BCN2pvw9Cks6G690f5z1qzp4uV1XhsD/qfh1eLoD1571pgM9TMwdDO NpamL3Z8V2Q5z8Kh1FjMRpTDsHWni6FcjEdmZPK4Hhn1wJb2zOOsZtXekt4j0g0= =l1XA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?491070378.115.1433971394542.JavaMail.jenkins>