Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:55:27 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion Message-ID: <41F679FF.5090809@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <41F571F4.1090504@he.iki.fi> References: <dc9ba0440501241359344adce1@mail.gmail.com> <41F571F4.1090504@he.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Petri Helenius wrote: > Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount > options? Async comes to mind first. a) ext3 and xfs are logging filesystems, so the problem with asynchronous metadata updates possibly corrupting the filesystem on a crash doesn't arise. b) asynchronous metadata updates wouldn't have any performance benefit on a dd if=/dev/zero of=tstfile. c) please cut down your quotes, and write your answers below or between the quoted text, instead of the outlook text-above-fullquote style. thanks. mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41F679FF.5090809>