Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 Nov 2001 12:43:52 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mount.h 
Message-ID:  <200111041943.fA4Jhq706497@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 04 Nov 2001 11:14:13 PST." <200111041914.fA4JEDC91016@apollo.backplane.com> 
References:  <200111041914.fA4JEDC91016@apollo.backplane.com>  <20011104130444.R26452-100000@achilles.silby.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200111041914.fA4JEDC91016@apollo.backplane.com> Matthew Dillon writes:
: 
: :On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Matt Dillon wrote:
: :
: :> dillon      2001/11/04 10:59:11 PST
: :>
: :>   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_4)
: :>     sys/sys              mount.h
: :>   Log:
: :>   Move the new vnodelist to the end of the mount structure to maintain
: :>   better compatibility with modules that might access the mount structure
: :>   but would otherwise not be effected by the vnodelist changes.
: :>
: :>   Revision  Changes    Path
: :>   1.89.2.5  +1 -1      src/sys/sys/mount.h
: :
: :Does any of this cause a problem if your userland and kernel are desynced?
: :
: :Mike "Silby" Silbersack
: 
:     Nothing critical.  pstat and fstat.  I was thinking more in regards to
:     any kld modules that might access the mount structure for purposes
:     other then what filesystems use it for.

So file systems with intimate knowledge of the mount structure, in
ways not typically done by modules and which none of the modules in
the tree do, will be impacted.  Is that right?

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111041943.fA4Jhq706497>