Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 16:35:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, davidg@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c Message-ID: <199608152235.QAA03483@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <25863.840147126@time.cdrom.com> References: <199608152202.PAA26974@austin.polstra.com> <25863.840147126@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Speaking of which, what do folks think about shutting down sup access > to -stable and forcing a move towards CTM and CVSup for -stablefolk? > > It's *very* wasteful to have all those supfilesrv process's scanning > the entire source tree for what are, at most, a couple of changes a > week, not to mention the overhead of cvs updating the checked out > version of -stable for sup on freefall. CVSup using checkout mode could easily be at least as compute bound as sup in checkout mode if it has to stat all the files everytime (which SUP with supscan running does only once), but John would be better suited to answer with the details. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608152235.QAA03483>