Date: Mon, 27 Mar 95 10:11:46 MST From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: davidg@Root.COM, paul@isl.cf.ac.uk, bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: shared library versioning Message-ID: <9503271711.AA02906@cs.weber.edu> In-Reply-To: <199503271324.XAA19834@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Mar 27, 95 11:24:51 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> will be no worse than the previous behavior. I suggest we just leave it alone > >> unless you have some other reason to bump the libc major number. > >> > > >Jordan's just added new hash code..... > > There is no problem for new interfaces, except possibly from namespace > pollution. I agree about the _major_ version number not needing a change when you only add interfaces -- you only change it when you delete/alter the existing ones; however, this *must* bump the _minor_ version number! Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9503271711.AA02906>