Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:20:45 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb.quenot@caraldi.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New port: NumlockX Message-ID: <20030929172043.GA54396@watt.intra.caraldi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030929130756.59cfb046.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> References: <20030909152452.GC10815@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <1063121517.50301.24.camel@jake> <20030929104642.GA8813@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <20030929130756.59cfb046.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Adam McLaurin: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:44 +0200 Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > > > I'm wondering why it always takes *ages* to change the ports tree. > > Either the committers are not interested, or they don't have spare > > time to handle such requests. > > According to the audit trail on ports/56638 , Ernst found many > problems with the port when running it through portlint. Ernst picked this PR today, and I thank him for having done so. > Have you addressed these issues? Perhaps he needs to run it through > again. I adressed these issues immediately, the updated port is available. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030929172043.GA54396>