Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:40:38 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> Subject: Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <20070526114038.2b6flw4k0044wgko@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20070525150517.GA63514@freebsd.org> References: <20070525095146.GA45288@freebsd.org> <200705251602.48778.shoesoft@gmx.net> <20070525150517.GA63514@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> (from Fri, 25 May 2007 17:05:17 +0200): > On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:02:47PM +0200, Stefan Ehmann wrote: >> GENERIC from today's current, also compiled with gcc34 from ports (I had to >> delete two gcc options in sys/conf/kern.mk): >> >> gcc34: 6530916 >> gcc42: 7352560 >> gcc34 -Os: 6074468 >> gcc42 -Os: 10058032 > > yes, thats it! I also used -Os. it looks like this occurs only with > -Os optimization > level. > > can someone else confirm this? and/or possibly explain this? Some datapoint: I also use -Os. Bye, Alexander. -- Everyone has a scheme for getting rich that will not work. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070526114038.2b6flw4k0044wgko>