Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:12:13 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/share/mk bsd.compat.mk Message-ID: <20050301031213.GA81726@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050228230434.GA62151@ip.net.ua> References: <200502280923.j1S9NcKE004088@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050228093414.GA74879@ip.net.ua> <20050228093622.GB74879@ip.net.ua> <20050228182618.GB56766@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228214233.GA6011@ip.net.ua> <20050228223115.GB62844@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228230434.GA62151@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:04:34AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:31:15PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:42:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > If you are just hiding the warning, can you explain your reasoning, > > > as in my opinion it just kills the idea of "deprecation". People > > > will continue to use it, without letting us remove it safely later. > > > > 1. We don't deprecate it. There is no reason to. We keep other "ugly" > > stuff for even more trival reasons. > > 2. The warnings give faults postivies to build issues. > > > *Shrug* > > 1. My plan on deprecating them in 7.0-RELEASE was OK'ed by core@. > For now (RELENG_5 and RELENG_6), old spellings are supported, > and deprecation warning is issued. > > 2. What makes NOCLEAN so special, what about other knobs? It is issued from the command line [many times], the others are written once in a Makefile. Since your desire to kill off 'NOCLEAN', I've lost the contents of /usr/obj many, many times when I wanted to do a quick compile test before committing. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050301031213.GA81726>