Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:17:53 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adaptec 29160 as module (on amd64) ? Message-ID: <40FC2C71.5090906@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407181957251.43309@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407181423090.43309@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <40FA8C5A.601@samsco.org> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407181957251.43309@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Scott Long wrote: > > Hi, > > >>>Either I am missing something or ahc is not supposed to be >>>working as module (on amd64) ? >>> >> >>I don't know of any reason why the ahc driver would behave any >>differently on amd64 vs any other platform. Unfortunately, amd64 >>doesn't fully support kernel modules yet. This is rumored to be >>fixed in time for 5.3. > > > well it's working mostly ok here for other parts. > > So the ahc driver should work ok as module ? Then I suspect detection > of the 29160 fails :( > Is there a reason why you suspect this? The driver is designed to match Id's that are 'close enough', and a stock 29160 should have no trouble being matched. Please compile the driver into the kernel to rule this out. As I've said before, kld modules are not 100% working or supported on amd64 yet. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40FC2C71.5090906>