Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Feb 1998 09:40:16 +0100
From:      Andreas Klemm <aklemm@hightek.com>
To:        Scot Elliott <scot@poptart.org>, aklemm@hightek.com, andreas@klemm.gtn.com
Cc:        isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sendmail virtusertable, do I need cw file as well ? Is NIS ok ?
Message-ID:  <19980227094016.02243@hightek.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980227073223.12197A-100000@uranus.planet-three.com>; from Scot Elliott on Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 07:41:57AM %2B0000
References:  <19980227080719.24948@klemm.gtn.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980227073223.12197A-100000@uranus.planet-three.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 07:41:57AM +0000, Scot Elliott wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> 
> > Does sendmail still need a sendmail.cw file, if I'm using the
> > virtuser table ?
> 
> 	Yes it does.

Thanks for confirmation.

> The real point of virtuser as far as I'm concerned, is to make it easy to
> have, say - scot@poptart.org and scot@planet-three.com go to different
> mail-drops on the same machine.  I personally have a seperat virtuser file
> for each mail domain I hold, say:
> 
> virtuser-poptart:
> scot@poptart.org	scot
> 
> virtuser-planet:
> scot@planet-three.com	s2
> 
> and then I have a newaliases shell script that builds a large virtuser
> from these smaller ones.  Just easier to manage that way.  The annoying
> thing though, is that the RHS of the alias has to be a single address -
> you can't specify multiple accounts as you would with /etc/aliases.

Aah, good to know ;-)  Ok, but I think it's sufficient this way.

> And generics is a good idea if either: 1. Your users send mail from a
> shall account - sendmail maps their usernames to email address.

You mean the users from a virtual domain, who have a shell account...
Otherwise they would get the domain name of the server where they are
logged in... So they get the correct domain in their From: ...

> 2. Your users use something like Eudora, which doesn't discriminate 
> between POP-account and E-mailaddress... Eudora sets From lines to the
> pop-account address.  Of course this won't work if they use someone else's
> SMTP server.

I don't see the point here, sorry. Example please (I got to get a cup
of coffie...)

> > The point is, I'm not sure if I can safely use NIS to distribute
> > the user accounts between several machines. And creating/managing
> > the passwd file on several machines looks odd ...
> 
> Don't be put off by Kerberos... I was surprised how easy it really is to
> set up.

But I think I will need real user accounts for people on such a thing
like a pop server. How would I get it managed with kerberos ???

I think kerberos only does authorization in a secure manner.
Here I surely need some additional things for a pop / ftp account,
or ???

	Andreas ///

-- 
Andreas Klemm		<aklemm@hightek.com>
			<andreas@FreeBSD.ORG>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980227094016.02243>