Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:33:36 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of RFC1644 support from CURRENT? Message-ID: <20041104033336.GA75906@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041103221235.I36862@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <20041103221235.I36862@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:15:04PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > Hi, >=20 > May I ask what the rationale behind this was (Besides the fact that no=20 > apps known to man actually use this support)? Read the net@ archives for the past week or two. Kris --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBiaMPWry0BWjoQKURAgnSAJ9fu8uqu8kPDr1LaXdJMVIitX/ODQCdFhsp rWgOexitX9g6VGdbcWZZNNc= =Dr9f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041104033336.GA75906>