Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:57:16 +0200 From: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> To: Bernhard Froehlich <decke@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox + VIMAGE Message-ID: <861v3yk19f.fsf@zhuzha.ua1> In-Reply-To: <c51ff723c5ffb7109b7be6e3cf8f7014@bluelife.at> (Bernhard Froehlich's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:19:57 %2B0100") References: <86oc77heqk.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <4D3D2DE9.2060004@freebsd.org> <86tygwy9p0.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <4D3F8357.2070005@freebsd.org> <62fcd16074e526547c3417a8f259174e@bluelife.at> <8662tbkahz.fsf@zhuzha.ua1> <c51ff723c5ffb7109b7be6e3cf8f7014@bluelife.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:19:57 +0100 Bernhard Froehlich wrote: BF> http://home.bluelife.at/patches/virtualbox-ose-kmod-devel-VIMAGE.diff BF> I've integrated it a bit better into the VirtualBox build system, added BF> the ports stuff and updated the patch for VirtualBox 4.0.2. Thanks! BF> It is currently unclear to me why you add VIMAGE to CFLAGS but nowhere BF> check for VIMAGE in VBoxNetFlt-freebsd.c. Shouldn't we add a check for BF> VIMAGE in the #if defined line or is this already done somewhere deep in BF> the included headers? All magic is in net/vnet.h :-) -- Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861v3yk19f.fsf>