Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 02:23:36 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: znerd@FreeBSD.org Cc: lioux@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.java.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <200203290723.g2T7NaFX001013@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200203281651.RAA04736@smtp.hccnet.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Mar, Ernst de Haan wrote:
>> JAVAVM=${LOCALBASE}/bin/javavm
>>
>> I prefer using javavm than ${JAVA}
>
> Why do you prefer javavm over java? Just curious, since it's been a
> while since I discussed the use of javavm with sobomax.
Every example out there uses "java". Granted, the examples are mostly
Windows oriented, but still. Why can't the javawrapper install
${PREFIX}/bin/java
instead of javavm?
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203290723.g2T7NaFX001013>