Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:12:52 -0800 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Julio Merino <julio@meroh.net> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r258285 - in head/lib/atf: libatf-c++/tests libatf-c/tests tests/test-programs Message-ID: <20131122001252.C33AE5807E@chaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <CADyfeQV9rMxQY8GoMHS=K7CrLDtUHR-o0qpK-Eho3hT0pL%2BDWA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201311172312.rAHNCtOY010186@svn.freebsd.org> <20131119003307.9E25A5807E@chaos.jnpr.net> <CADyfeQV9rMxQY8GoMHS=K7CrLDtUHR-o0qpK-Eho3hT0pL%2BDWA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:29:15 -0500, Julio Merino writes: >> Actually . or _ worked, until recently. > >I think only supporting one form is better in the name of simplicity. Generally I would agree. Originally I used '_' for this and a number of other things, but in many cases find that '.' makes for easier reading. >> Will fix. > >Garrett also mentioned to me that we should not be required to >explicitly set SRCS.*: when building various programs, each of them Being explicit doesn't hurt.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131122001252.C33AE5807E>