Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:49:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>, <brian@freebsd-services.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist src/etc/namedb named.conf Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0108231143390.75946-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us> In-Reply-To: <200108231624.f7NGOZg73719@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Brian Somers wrote: > Changing this breaks configurations that currently say > > named_enable=YES > > in rc.conf (without any other variables). I don't believe that > the benefit (none at all - as you point out, it's disabled out of > the box) is worth the breakage of existing configurations. Yes, true. In -CURRENT this won't be a big deal. In -STABLE it is probably good enough that we have a note in defaults/rc.conf that named can be run in a sandbox. It doesn't really motivate one to do so, though. Maybe instead of saying "it may be possible to run named in a sandbox" we could be a little more assertive and say "it would be a REALLY good idea if you ran named in a sandbox". -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet - Available for IA32 (Intel x86) and Alpha architectures - IA64, PowerPC, UltraSPARC, and ARM architectures under development - http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.32.0108231143390.75946-100000>