Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:44:15 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changes to route(8) or routing between r325235 and r326782? Message-ID: <5A2FF94F.4080404@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <201712121515.vBCFFpng086723@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201712121515.vBCFFpng086723@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
12.12.2017 22:15, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > The FreeBSD kernel now has a BIGGER bug, it now totally ignores the > user's specified routing policy and makes routing policy decissions > of its own, thinking that it knows what is best for the user. > > The whole maintain_loopback_route should be KILLED from the kernel, > it is simply the wrong thing to be doing. Only if you can supply alternative way to assign highest priority (administrative distance = 0) for "directly connected" routes. And ability to override dynamically received prefixes with direct interface address assignment.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A2FF94F.4080404>