Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:17:09 -0500
From:      Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To:        Alexander Motin <mav@alkar.net>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pmtud problem
Message-ID:  <45D35225.2080103@seclark.us>
In-Reply-To: <45D2410D.70509@alkar.net>
References:  <1171398196.00688135.1171386001@10.7.7.3>	<1171398210.00688151.1171387801@10.7.7.3>	<1171401795.00688172.1171391400@10.7.7.3> <45D2410D.70509@alkar.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Motin wrote:

>Stephen Clark wrote:
>  
>
>>>>if the pc sends a packet of 1460 bytes with the DF bit set shouldn't the
>>>>freebsd 4.9 system
>>>>send back an icmp dest unreachable - fragmentation needed and DF bit 
>>>>set?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Are you blocking icmp with a firewall filter?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Good  question - but the answer is no. The other interesting fact is 
>>when I drop the mtu on
>>the gre to 1412 I do see the icmp messages.
>>    
>>
>
>Are you using any dummynet shapes? There is ancient bug in dummynet, 
>which leads to not sending of ICMPs when shape used on outgoing interface.
>
>  
>
Hi Alexander,

I had run into that problem before, in this case I am seing a icmp for 
1420 mtu for the gre
 on the 4.9 side but the tun0 interface that pppoe is 1492 to allow for 
the ppp wrapper and I just
read that the gif when using ipv4  doesn't handle pmtud - that I think 
is my real problem.

Steve

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty 
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45D35225.2080103>