Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:28:46 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Paul Murphy <pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel? Message-ID: <20021206232846.GB2668@fourtytwo.gamesoc> In-Reply-To: <20021206171011.166323e8.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> References: <20021206201133.GA77953@leafy.idv.tw> <200212061429.37743.cbiffle@safety.net> <20021206171011.166323e8.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:10:11PM -0500, Paul Murphy wrote: > On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:29:37 -0700 > "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net> wrote: > > > > group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable using the athlon-tbird > > optimizations. Not to mention smokingly fast. > > Is that just a -CURRENT thing, I can't see anything like that in -STABLE's LINT. > -CURRENT use gcc 3.2.1, which has support for pentium[2,3,4] and athlon[tbird,xp,mp,4] architectures. 2.95 which is the compiler used in -STABLE only has i386 to i686, so can't produce code directly supporting the newer architectures. -- Bruce Cran To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021206232846.GB2668>